How we vote: Ranked Choice Voting and “Top Two”

I had an email conversation with Joe, a dancer friend of mine, and I’m sharing part of it in this blog. It’s about the voting systems showing up on our ballots in the Bay Area. We’ve had some election changes in recent years, and so our November ballot shows evidence of two systems: Ranked Choice Voting and “Top Two” primary.

Ranked Choice Voting, also known as IRV/Instant Runoff Voting, takes place in one election — the November “general” election — the election in which people are more likely to vote. San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, and San Leandro in the Bay Area use this voting system for municipal offices.

In RCV voters rank their choices 1-2-3 so that the winner actually gets a majority of votes in one election. If a voter’s first choice is out of the running, then their 2nd choice gets picked up and so on until someone gets a majority of 50%+1.  The goal is that you can vote for the candidate you prefer (what a concept!) and then put as your 2nd and 3rd choices the next best and the lesser-of-two-evil candidates. The question of “spoiler” is thrown out the window. Vote for who you want without regard to “who-can-win”, a label which unfortunately is determined by money from the 1% and their corporations.

The other system is the “Top Two” Primary and it’s the reason there are only two people on the November ballot for state offices this election. The Top Two primary system still uses two elections rather than one. In the June primary, a lower turnout election (only 30% this time!), the field gets whittled down to two. Top Two primaries have historically favored incumbents and highly funded candidates because of name recognition. They win the top two spots in the primary and all others (like Greens) are cut out of the general election in November. That’s what happened in June 2012, the first Top Two primary in California.

This can change for the better, however, since in “Top Two” any voter can vote for any candidate.  In the future the top two could be a Green or other no-corporate-money candidate and a Titanic Party candidate. And the no-corporate-money candidate would have a good chance of winning! In California, we might have an even better chance if there were just a Green/no-corporate-money candidate and a Republican rather than a Democrat.

That’s looking ahead to 2014. As for 2012, the only chance you have to vote Green is in some local races and for president — so take advantage of that!

Here’s to building strength in the “No Corporate Money” Campaign.

About Laura Wells: Solutions
I ran for Controller in California in 2014 on a State Bank and Tax The Rich platform. I am part of the “No Corporate Money” Campaign, in which candidates pledge to take no corporate money and voters declare our intention to vote for no-corporate-money candidates. As a Green Party candidate for Governor of California in 2010, I was arrested outside a gubernatorial debate for “trespassing at a private party.” But we won't stop, and so let's create a "public party" where we debate solutions to California's finances, like implementing a State Bank and taxing the rich -- to reduce the disparity and open up opportunities. Twitter: @LauraWellsCA

One Response to How we vote: Ranked Choice Voting and “Top Two”

  1. I was pretty pleased to discover this web site. I want to to thank you for ones time for this particularly fantastic read!! I definitely liked every bit of it and I have you book marked to see new information on your site. http://on.fb.me/14490oq

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: